Cauchy definition of definite integral
This note is about Cauchy’s (real-variable) approach to the definite integral as a limit of sums, historically preceding the modern formulation of the Riemann integral. (Not to be confused with the complex-analytic Cauchy integral formula.)
Origins (very brief)
- Archimedes: method of exhaustion via upper/lower approximations of areas/volumes.
- Kepler / Cavalieri / Wallis: infinitesimal-style decompositions and “indivisibles”.
- Newton–Leibniz: integral as inverse operation to differentiation.
- Cauchy: returns to area-style definition and makes limit language explicit.
Cauchy sums
Assume
Cauchy considers sums like
and argues that as the subdivision gets finer (the maximum
He also notes one can choose sample points inside each subinterval, i.e.
which is essentially the tagged-sum viewpoint later used by Riemann.
Conceptual caveat (modern viewpoint)
Varying the partition does not naturally produce a sequence; it forms a directed family (a net) indexed by refinements. This is one place where the original 19th century discussions can look imprecise by modern standards.
Beyond continuity (Cauchy/Dirichlet/Lebesgue)
Cauchy also sketches extensions beyond continuous functions by splitting the interval into pieces where the function behaves well, and defining the integral by limits near singular/discontinuous points.
Dirichlet extends this idea to certain functions with infinitely many discontinuities but only finitely many accumulation points.
A key limitation (as discussed by Lebesgue) is that the Cauchy–Dirichlet approach essentially requires an antiderivative-type representation on intervals of continuity and restricts the discontinuity set (e.g. to be countable).