Integration on Rn

Schuller GR.
Throughout this note, we assume that all integrals we write down are well-defined (i.e., they exist in the appropriate sense, such as Riemann or Lebesgue).
The simplest case is that of a function F:R→R, where we simply have

∫(a,b)F:=∫abdxF(x),

where the right-hand side integral is some known integration operation (e.g., Riemann integrals, Lebesgue integrals).

Next we can consider F:Rd→R. If we are to do this over a box-shaped domain, (a,b)×…×(u,v)⊂Rd, the integral is simply

∫(a,b)×…×(u,v)ddxF(x):=∫abdx1…∫uvdxdF(x1,…,xd).

We can then extend this to general domains (i.e., not necessarily box-shaped) G⊂Rd by introducing an indicator function μG:Rd→R given by

μG(x)={1if x∈G0otherwise.

We then define the integral

∫GddxF(x):=∫−∞∞dx1…∫−∞∞dxdμG(x)F(x).

It represents the generalized volume of a container with base U and whose variable height is given by F.

\usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
\begin{document} 

\tdplotsetmaincoords{70}{110}
\begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
% Define the coordinates of the base (subset U)
\coordinate (A) at (-2,1,0);
\coordinate (B) at (-1,2,0);
\coordinate (C) at (1,2,0);
\coordinate (D) at (2,1,0);
\coordinate (E) at (1,-1,0);
\coordinate (F) at (-1,-1.5,0);

% Draw the base (irregular subset U)
\draw[fill=blue!20, opacity=0.7] 
    plot [smooth cycle] 
    coordinates {(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)} node[below right]{$U$};

% Define the heights of the surface points
\coordinate (A') at (-2,1,2.8);
\coordinate (B') at (-1,2,2.5);
\coordinate (C') at (1,2,3.2);
\coordinate (D') at (2,1,2.8);
\coordinate (E') at (1,-1,2.5);
\coordinate (F') at (-1,-1.5,2.7);

% Draw the surface defined by F(x, y)
\draw[fill=red!20, opacity=0.7] 
    plot [smooth cycle] 
    coordinates {(A') (B') (C') (D') (E') (F')};

% Draw dashed lines connecting base to surface (prism walls)
\foreach \base/\top in {A/A', B/B', C/C', D/D', E/E', F/F'} {
    \draw[dashed] (\base) -- (\top);
}

% Axis
\draw[thick,->] (-3,0,0) -- (3,0,0) node[anchor=north east]{$x$};
\draw[thick,->] (0,-3,0) -- (0,3,0) node[anchor=north west]{$y$};
\draw[thick,->] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,4) node[anchor=south]{$z$};

\end{tikzpicture} 
\end{document}

We now need to ask how this definition changes under a change of variable (which will correspond to a change of chart in the lifted notion).

Theorem: Let ϕ:ϕ−1(G)→G denote the change of variable map with G⊂Rd,ϕ−1(G)⊂Rd. Then if the integral of F:G→R is defined as above, we have

∫GddxF(x)=∫ϕ−1(G)ddy|det(∂ϕa∂yb)(y)|(F∘ϕ)(y),

where |det(∂ϕa∂yb)(y)| is the Jacobian of ϕ. Sometimes the Jacobian is defined without the absolute value part, but here we shall use the whole thing. ◼

Integration of forms

The change of variables theorem implies that we can interpret integration as if we are actually integrating n-forms. That is, if we have in Rn a set U and a function f, both could be reinterpreted in a new coordinate system, given by ϕ, as G~=ϕ(G) and f~=f∘ϕ−1. If we think of f not like a function but like an n-form (by using the standard volume form in Rn), then after the change ω=fdx will become in the n-form ω~=Jac(ϕ)⋅f∘ϕ−1dy and therefore

∫Uω=∫U~ω~

From here, we can go to integration on manifolds.