Integration on Rn

Schuller GR.
We are assuming that the following exists. We shall assume that the results exist for this whole entry.
The simplest case is that of a function F:RR, where we simply have

(a,b)F:=abdxF(x),

where the right-hand side integral is some known integration operation (e.g., Riemann integrals, Lebesgue integrals).

Next we can consider F:RdR. If we are to do this over a box-shaped domain, (a,b)××(u,v)Rd, the integral is simply

(a,b)××(u,v)ddxF(x):=abdx1uvdxdF(x1,,xd).

We can then extend this to general domains (i.e., not necessarily box-shaped) GRd by introducing an indicator function μG:RdR given by

μG(x)={1if xG0otherwise.

We then define the integral

GddxF(x):=dx1dxdμG(x)F(x).

It represents the generalized volume of a container with base U and whose variable height is given by F.

\usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
\begin{document} 

\tdplotsetmaincoords{70}{110}
\begin{tikzpicture}[tdplot_main_coords]
% Define the coordinates of the base (subset U)
\coordinate (A) at (-2,1,0);
\coordinate (B) at (-1,2,0);
\coordinate (C) at (1,2,0);
\coordinate (D) at (2,1,0);
\coordinate (E) at (1,-1,0);
\coordinate (F) at (-1,-1.5,0);

% Draw the base (irregular subset U)
\draw[fill=blue!20, opacity=0.7] 
    plot [smooth cycle] 
    coordinates {(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)} node[below right]{$U$};

% Define the heights of the surface points
\coordinate (A') at (-2,1,2.8);
\coordinate (B') at (-1,2,2.5);
\coordinate (C') at (1,2,3.2);
\coordinate (D') at (2,1,2.8);
\coordinate (E') at (1,-1,2.5);
\coordinate (F') at (-1,-1.5,2.7);

% Draw the surface defined by F(x, y)
\draw[fill=red!20, opacity=0.7] 
    plot [smooth cycle] 
    coordinates {(A') (B') (C') (D') (E') (F')};

% Draw dashed lines connecting base to surface (prism walls)
\foreach \base/\top in {A/A', B/B', C/C', D/D', E/E', F/F'} {
    \draw[dashed] (\base) -- (\top);
}

% Axis
\draw[thick,->] (-3,0,0) -- (3,0,0) node[anchor=north east]{$x$};
\draw[thick,->] (0,-3,0) -- (0,3,0) node[anchor=north west]{$y$};
\draw[thick,->] (0,0,0) -- (0,0,4) node[anchor=south]{$z$};

\end{tikzpicture} 
\end{document}

We now need to ask how this definition changes under a change of variable (which will correspond to a change of chart in the lifted notion).

Theorem: Let ϕ:ϕ1(G)G denote the change of variable map with GRd,ϕ1(G)Rd. Then if the integral of F:GR is defined as above, we have

GddxF(x)=ϕ1(G)ddy|det(ϕayb)(y)|(Fϕ)(y),

where |det(ϕayb)(y)| is the Jacobian of ϕ. Sometimes the Jacobian is defined without the absolute value part, but here we shall use the whole thing.

Integration of forms

The change of variables theorem implies that we can interpret integration as if we are actually integrating n-forms. That is, if we have in Rn a set U and a function f, both could be reinterpreted in a new coordinate system, given by ϕ, as G~=ϕ(G) and f~=fϕ1. If we think of f not like a function but like an n-form (by using the standard volume form in Rn), then after the change ω=fdx will become in the n-form ω~=Jac(ϕ)fϕ1dy and therefore

Uω=U~ω~

From here, we can go to integration on manifolds.