It is a set together with a transitive group action of a group . There is only one orbit and so is isomorphic to the space of cosets being the stabilizer or isotropy group for an arbitrary : the map
being for any is bijective.
The choice of has no influence since the isotropy groups are conjugate.
Basic examples:
and
Any connected topological manifold is homogeneous with , see this answer in Mathstackexchange. The same is true for any connected smooth manifold and its group of diffeomorphisms. But keep an eye: these groups are infinite dimensional.
Any finite set of cardinal is homogeneous with the symmetric group. Indeed, any set is homogeneous with respect to its bijections, I guess.
When the isotropy group is the identity, , and is called a principal homogeneous space or -torsor. This happens if the group action is also free, as well as transitive, that is, regular.
Proposition. Let be a connected Lie group and is a closed subgroup of such that the homogeneous space is contractible. Then is homeomorphic to a Euclidean space for some . Proof. This question in MO
Homogeneous spaces are used, to my knowledge, in two different ways:
We can be interested in the submanifolds contained in them, which can be studied by means of extrinsic moving frames.
Intuitive approach
Suppose we have a complicated (real-world) object which we can describe by means of a well known (mathematical-world) object . Examples:
A plane piece of land described by .
A list of students described by the set .
...
The object is homogeneous with respect to the group in the sense that:
There is a physical linkage, or external linkage, from to , which is introduced externally. Let's call it .
All the possible descriptions of are given by .
Suppose we have a distinguished point in (for example or ). At first it may seem that the point is a privileged point, since it is described by the "main point" of . But it turns out that
being (with the isotropy group of in and any map sending to ) all the descriptions of "centered at" . That is, consist of descriptions of in which is described by the distinguished point . It is clear that all are "equal", and so we say that is homogeneous. For example, no point of the land is special, all of them can be chosen to be the center of the world; and no student is special, all of them can be chosen to be associated with the label 1.
Now, it is interesting to now if we can shrink to a subgroup in such a way that still conserve this property. Why do we want to restrict? Because there are descriptions which are more important than others. For example, any "crazy" bijection may not give rise to an interesting description (maybe it is interesting for an alien, but not for us). We are interested in bijections that do not clutter the set too much (for example, with our "sense" of continuity). The choice of is again an external data, which depends on the nature of the problem we are interested in. But the group needs to be transitive, in order to conserve homogeneity.
G-descriptions
An element is a -basis or -description of in the sense that we can define the coordinates of a point as
The group not only serves to parameterize the "-descriptions" of . It also defines an action on through . The action of on is . If we fix a point (corresponding to certain by means of ) we get a bijection (being the isotropy group of ) given by
being an element of carrying to . So many times we identify with , or even start the construction with .
This bijection let us to express the points of in "coordinates" in . Given , the element have coordinates
In particular, if we think in described by the set by means of the identity and with selected points , then an abstract point is expressed in a frame as
Example , , ,
An element is a translation following a linear transformation , and sends the canonical reference system to a new one. The coordinates of a point in the new reference system are computed by means of .
In particular itself is a homogeneous space (). Every element is, at the same time, a "point", a "movement" and a "frame". Movements and frames are the same, see general covariance and contravariance. Now, given any other point , how it is described from the frame ? Well, according to this we take
Well, in this case we can decompose the space in the orbits . The group acts transitively in every so we have bijections
where is the isotropy group of some point in . Then we have several principal bundles , not only one. I think this has to do with subrepresentations of groups, but I have to think more on this.