Euclidean plane

From the point of view of classical differential geometry

The Euclidean plane is the manifold M=R2, with coordinates (x1,x2), together with the natural Riemannian metric

g=dx1⊗dx1+dx2⊗dx2.

It is, therefore, a Riemannian manifold.

Seen as a plain manifold we can consider that M is endowed with a natural linear connection ∇, such that ∇∂xi∂xj=0∂x1+0∂x2. The induced principal connection on the frame bundle is given by the 1-form

ω=(c11c12c21c22)−1⋅(dc11dc12dc21dc22)∈Ω1(R2,gl(2))

at

f=(c11c12x1c21c22x2001)∈FM

Here it is shown how to construct ω is constructed from an arbitrary ∇.

On the other hand, if we think of M as a Riemannian manifold we can consider the Levi-Civita connection ∇LC. Since the metric is constant, the covariant derivative ∇LC coincides with the natural covariant derivative ∇, so it induces the same connection ω on FM.
But the metric g also specifies a orthonormal frame bundle OM (see here why). The elements of this principal bundle are

f=(c−1−c2x11−c2cx2001)∈OM

with c∈[−1,1].
Since

ω|OM=(c1−c2−1−c2c)⋅(dcc1−c2dc−c1−c2dcdc)==(0dc1−c2−dc1−c20)∈Ω(R2,o(2)),

according to Proposition 4.7. in vicenteBundles, this connection can be reduced to a connection on the orthonormal frame bundle determined by the metric g.

If we parameterize this principal bundle OM with

(x1,x2,θ)↦(cos⁡(θ)−sin⁡(θ)x1sin⁡(θ)cos⁡(θ)x2001)

we obtain the more famous expression for ω:

(0dθ−dθ0)

Remember: this 1-form tells us how much the bases at f and f′ "fail to be constant" when we pass from the frame f to a nearby frame f′, but expressing this mistake with respect to the frame f itself.

From the point of view of Cartan geometry

The Euclidean plane is a Cartan geometry modeled over (E(2),O(2)) , indeed is the Klein geometry (E(2),O(2)). Moreover, it is a reductive Klein geometry since

e(2)={(Cv00):C∈o(2),v∈R2}=o(2)⊕p

We have a natural choice for p

p={(0p00):p∈R2}.

With this in mind, remember that the Maurer-Cartan form describes all possible "infinitesimal displacements" of the frame f, but from the point of view of the frame f itself (see this). That is, if we pass from the frame f to another frame f′, the Maurer-Cartan form at f applied to the "vector" ff′→=(dx1,dx2,dθ) is a packet of information

A=(0−dθcos(θ)dx1+sin(θ)dx2dθ0−sin(θ)dx1+cos(θ)dx2000)∈e(2)

Here is encoded, on the one hand, how much have we moved the base point of f to the base point of f′ and, on the other, how much have we changed the basis itself. The natural choice of p let us think that the information about the change of base point is in the v part (the projection of the Maurer-Cartan form on p), and so the projection of the Maurer-Cartan form on o(2), (0dθ−dθ0), tell us how much has the basis changed. That is, the same as the connection 1-form of the connection on the orthonormal bundle induced by the metric g (which is the Levi-Civita connection).

To summarize:
In other words, in the orthonormal frame bundle induced by the metric g we consider a displacement from a frame f=(Cp01) to a frame f′=(C′p′01) .
The principal connection ω induced by the Levi-Civita connection measures the change from C to C′ as an element of o(2).
The Cartan connection (Maurer-Cartan form) measures the change from f to f′ as an element of e(2). This change can be decomposed like the union of a change from C to C′ and a change from p to p′. This is reflected in the fact that e(2)=o(2)⊕p. If we focus on the change from C to C′ we have the principal connection ω.